posted-content Front Matter
Elsevier now officially a “predatory” publisher
Björn Brembs December 11, 2019
For a number of years now, publishers who expect losing revenue in a transition to Open Access have been spreading fear about journals which claim to perform peer-review on submitted manuscripts, but then collect the publishing fee of a few […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Tagging and knocking out FoxP with CRISPR/Cas9
Björn Brembs July 16, 2020
The FoxP gene family comprises a set of transcription factors that gained fame because of their involvement in the acquisition of speech and language. While early hypotheses circulated about its function as a ‘learning gene’, a simultaneous “motor-hypothesis” stipulated that […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Are Nature’s APCs ‘outrageous’ or ‘very attractive’?
Björn Brembs November 30, 2020
Last week, there was a lot of outrage at the announcement of Nature’s new pricing options for their open access articles. People took to twitter to voice their, ahem, concern. Some examples: There are many more that all express their […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
High APCs are a feature, not a bug
Björn Brembs December 9, 2020
There has been some outrage at the announcement that Nature is following through with their 2004 declaration of charging ~10k ($/€) in article processing charges (APCs). However, not only have these charges been 16 years in the making but the […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
What sinister time machine?
Björn Brembs July 19, 2021
A recent OASPA guest post reminded me of something I have been wondering about for several years now. What sinister time travel device is keeping some sections of the scholarly ecosystem from leaving the past and coming back to the […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Why do academic institutions seem stuck in 1995?
Björn Brembs September 25, 2020
Until the late 1980s or early 1990s, academic institutions such as universities and research institutes were at the forefront of developing and implementing digital technology. After email they developed Gopher, TCP/IP, http, the NCSA Mosaic browser and experimented with Mbone. […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
How academic institutions neglect their duty
Björn Brembs October 5, 2020
Think, check, submit: who hasn’t heard of this mantra to help researchers navigate the jungle of commercial publishers? Who isn’t under obligation to publish in certain venues, be it because employers ask for a particular set of journals for hiring, […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Replacing the prestige signal
Björn Brembs February 4, 2022
tl;dr: Evidence suggests that the prestige signal in our current journals is noisy, expensive and flags unreliable science. There is a lack of evidence that the supposed filter function of prestigious journals is not just a biased random selection of […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Scholarly publishing in three cartoons
Björn Brembs March 10, 2021
The academic journal publishing system sure feels all too often a bit like a sinking boat: we have a reproducibility leak an affordability leak a functionality leak a data leak a code leak an interoperability leak a discoverability leak a […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Is the SNSI the new PRISM?
Björn Brembs October 26, 2020
Just before Christmas 2019, the Washington Post reported, based on “people familiar with the matter”, that the US Justice Department were investigating the Sci-Hub founder Alexandra Elbakyan for potentially “working with Russian intelligence to steal U.S. military secrets from defense […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Can funders mandate institutions?
Björn Brembs January 6, 2021
For a few years now I have been arguing that in order to accomplish change in scholarly infrastructure, it likely is an inefficient plan by funding agencies to mandate the least powerful players in the game, authors (i.e., their grant […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Minimizing the collective action problem
Björn Brembs May 12, 2021
Most academics would agree that the way scholarship is done today, in the broadest, most general terms, is in dire need of modernization. Problems abound from counter-productive incentives, inefficiencies, lack of reproducibility, to an overemphasis on competition at the expense […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Come and do research with us!
Björn Brembs October 13, 2020
Trial and error is a successful problem-solving strategy not only in humans but throughout evolution. How do nervous systems generate novel, creative trials and how are errors incorporated into already existing experiences in order to improve future trials? We use […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Who’s responsible for the lack of action?
Björn Brembs September 3, 2020
There are regular discussions among academics as to who should be the prime mover in infrastructure reform. Some point to the publishers to finally change their business model. Others claim that researchers need to vote with their feet and change […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
The trinity of failures
Björn Brembs October 8, 2021
More and more experts are calling for the broken and destructive academic journal system to be replaced with modern solutions. This post summarizes why and how this task can now be accomplished. It was first published in German on the […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...
posted-content Front Matter
Academic publishing – market or collectivization?
Björn Brembs December 13, 2021
Last week’s podium on the commodification of open science entitled “If you are not paying for the product, you are the product?” was surprisingly unanimous on the need to radically modernize academic publishing and abolish the current publishing system relying […] ↓ Read the rest of this entry...